উইকিপিডিয়া:দ্রুত অপসারণের জন্য বিচারধারা

উইকিপিডিয়া, মুক্ত বিশ্বকোষ থেকে
সরাসরি যাও: পরিভ্রমণ, অনুসন্ধান

দ্রুত অপসারণের জন্য বিচারধারা (Criteria for speedy deletion) সীমিত ঘটনা নির্দেশ করে যেখানে কোন প্রশাসক কোনো প্রকার আলোচনা ব্যতীরেকে উইকিপিডিয়া ‘নিবন্ধ পাতা’ অথবা ‘মিডিয়া’ (যেমন, ফটো) মুছে ফেলতে পারেন। অন্যদিকে, ‘প্রশাসক’ নয় এমন ‘ব্যবহারকারী’ একটি প্রাসঙ্গিক ফলক অর্থাৎ টেমপ্লেট যোগ করার মাধ্যমে দ্রুত অপসারণের অনুরোধ করতে পারেন (নিচের পদ্ধতি দেখুন )। এই প্রসঙ্গটি, দ্রুত নিবন্ধ সৃষ্টি করা থেকে সময় কালকে প্রসারিত না-করে সহজ সিদ্ধান্ত গ্রহণ পদ্ধতিকে নির্দেশ করে।

এই পাতাটিতে দ্রুত অপসারণের বিচারধারা বর্ণনা করা হয়েছে এবং প্রাসঙ্গিক ‘ফলক’ বা ‘টেমপ্লেটে’র একটি তালিকা দেওয়া আছে যা দ্রুত অপসারণের উপযুক্ত জন্য কোনো নিবন্ধে ব্যবহার করা যাবে। এই বিচারধারা সংক্ষিপ্তভাবে বর্ণনা করা হয়েছে সুতরাং প্রায়শই যুক্তিসম্মতভাবে সম্পাদকগণ এতে সম্মত হবেন যা প্রদত্ত মানদন্ড অনুসারে সম্মুখিন হন ও হননা। কোথায় যুক্তিসম্মত সংশয় থাকলে, আলোচনার মাধ্যমে অপসারণ নীতির অধীনে অন্য পদ্ধতি ব্যবহার করা উচিত। যদি কোনো ‘নিবন্ধ পাতা’ আগে কোনো অপসারণের আলোচনার মাধ্যমে টিকে গিয়ে থাকে, সেটি দ্রুত মুছে ফেলা হয়ত যাবে না, যদি না নতুন কোন কপিরাইট বিধিলঙ্ঘন খুঁজে পাওয়া যায়।

অপসারণ দরকার হয় না যদি কোনো পাতা এই বিচারধারা পড়ে । দ্রুত নিবন্ধ অপসারণ মনোনয়ন করার পূর্বে, সেটিকে একটি অসম্পূর্ণ নিবন্ধে বা উন্নতি করে, অথবা অন্য কোনো নিবন্ধে পুনর্নির্দেশীত করে অথবা অপসারনের অন্যান্য কিছু প্রক্রিয়ায় পরিচালনা করা উচিত। যদি উক্ত পদ্ধতি সম্ভব হয়, দ্রুত অপসারণ সম্ভবত করা যাবে না। অবদানকারীগণ কখনও কখনও কতিপয় সম্পাদনের দ্বারা নিবন্ধ তৈরি করে, তাই পাতাটি তৈরি হবার খুব শীঘ্রই অপসারণ করা থেক বিরত থাকুন যদি তা অসম্পূর্ণ মনে হয়। কোনো ব্যবহারকারী দ্রুত অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা করলে তা কোন বিচারধারা অনুসারে প্রযুক্ত হচ্ছে তা পাতায় উল্লেখ করা উচিত । কপিরাইট সম্পর্কিত বিষয় ব্যতীত যা আপনি অপসাণরের জন্য মনোনয়ন করছেন তা কোনো বিশ্বাসযোগ্য অবদানকারী ও প্রধান অবদানকারীর অবদান হলে দ্রুত অপসারণের ক্ষেত্রে সাধারনত নম্রভাবে বিবেচনা করা হয়।

পরিচ্ছেদসমূহ

বিচারধারা[সম্পাদনা]

কখনও কখনও শব্দসংক্ষেপ দ্বারা এই বিচারধারা উল্লেখ করতে ব্যবহার করা হয়। উদাহরণ স্বরূপ " G12 " দ্বারা সাধারণ বিচারধারার অধীনে ১২ নম্বরে উল্লিখিত (কপিরাইট বিধিলঙ্ঘন) বোঝায়। এই শব্দসংক্ষেপ নতুন সম্পাদককে বিভ্রান্ত করতে পারে অথবা এই পাতার সঙ্গে যে কেউ অপরিচিত থাকতে পারেন;বিভিন্ন অবস্থায় একটি সরল বাংলা বা ইংরেজিতে ব্যাক্ষ্যা করে নির্দিষ্ট নিবন্ধ মুছে ফেলা শ্রেয়।

এই বিচারধারার প্রত্যেকের জন্য একটি টেবিল টেমপ্লিট তালিকা নিচে দেওয়া হল।

সাধারণ বিচারধারা[সম্পাদনা]

এই বিচারধারাগুলি সকল নামস্থানে প্রয়োগ হয় এবং নির্দিষ্ট নামস্থানের জন্য নিন্মলিখিত পরিচ্ছদে আছে।

  1. স্পষ্টত প্রতীয়মান অর্থহীন শব্দ: এমন পাতা যাতে স্পষ্টত অপ্রাসঙ্গিক, অবোধগম্য এবং অর্থহীন শব্দ বা শব্দসমষ্টি বিদ্যমান। তবে ব্যবহারকারী পাতা, নিম্মমানের সম্পাদনা, দলীয় বক্তৃতা, অশ্লীল মন্তব্য, ধ্বংসপ্রবনতা, কাল্পনিক তথ্য, বাংলা ব্যতীত অন্য ভাষায় লেখা তথ্য, নিম্মমানের অনুবাদ, অসম্ভাব্য তত্ত্ব, গুজব এই ধারার আওতায় পড়ে না; তবে এধরনের কিছু তথ্য, তীব্র ধ্বংসপ্রবণতা হিসেবে নিবন্ধ থেকে অপসারণ করা যেতে পারে।
  1. পরীক্ষামূলক পাতা: এমন পাতা যেটি উইকিপিডিয়া সম্পাদনা বা এর কোন ক্রিয়াপ্রণালী পরখ করার উদ্দেশ্যে তৈরী করা হয়েছে। উইকিপিডিয়ার খেলাঘর পাতার কোন উপপাতা যদি কেউ পরীক্ষার উদ্দেশ্যে তৈরী করে তা এই ধারা অনুযায়ী অপসারণযোগ্য তবে খেলাঘর পাতাটি নিজে এর অন্তর্গত নয়। তবে প্রধান নামস্থান বা টেমপ্লেট ব্যতীত ব্যবহারকারী পাতা এবং এর উপপাতাসমূহ এই ধারার আওতায় পড়ে না।
  1. নিশ্চিত ধ্বংসপ্রবণতা: এই ধারার আওতায় পড়ে আক্রমনাত্বক তথ্য, নিশ্চিত ভুল তথ্য এবং কপি-পেস্টের মাধ্যমে স্থানান্তরকৃত পাতায় ধ্বংসপ্রবণতা।
  1. অপসারিত পাতা পুনরায় তৈরিকরণ: অপসারণ প্রস্তাবনার মাধ্যমে কোনো পাতা অপসারিত হলে যে নামেই হোক, যদি সেই নিবন্ধ কিংবা তার অনুরূপ নিবন্ধ পুনরায় সৃষ্টি করা হয় তবে তা কোনোক্রমেই নিবন্ধ অপসারণের কারণকে পরিবর্তন করে না। অপসারিত পাতার অনুরূপ নয়, অপসারণের কারণগুলো আর প্রযোজ্য নয় কিংবা নিবন্ধের বিষয়বস্তু যা ব্যবহারকারীর খসড়া পাতায় উল্লেখযোগ্য উন্নয়নের জন্য রাখা হয়েছে — এমন নিবন্ধ এর অন্তর্ভুক্ত নয় (যা কোনোক্রমেই অপসারণ নীতির সাথে প্রতারণার নয়)। আলোচনার মাধ্যমে অপসারিত বা দ্রুত অপসারণের মাধ্যমে অপসারিত পাতা যা অপসারণ পর্যালোচনার মাধ্যমে পুনরায় ফিরিয়ে আনা হয়েছে, এমন বিষয়বস্তুও এই বিচারধারার আওতাবহির্ভূত (তবে এক্ষেত্রেও দ্রুত অপসারণের কারণটি রয়ে যেতে পারে)।
  1. নিষিদ্ধ ব্যবহারকারী: নিষিদ্ধ কিংবা বাধাপ্রাপ্ত ব্যবহারকারী যদি তাদেরকে নিষিদ্ধকরণ বা বাধাদান নীতির লঙ্ঘনের মাধ্যমে কোনো নিবন্ধ সৃষ্টি করে কিংবা কোনো সম্পাদনা করে, তবে এ বিচারধারা প্রযোজ্য হবে।
  • এই বিচারধারা প্রযোজ্য হতে হলে নিবন্ধ তৈরি বা সম্পাদনা করার সময় ঐ ব্যবহারকারীকে নিষিদ্ধ কিংবা বাধাপ্রাপ্ত হতে হবে। নিষিদ্ধ করা কিংবা বাধা দেওয়ার পূর্বের কোনো নিবন্ধ বা সম্পাদনার জন্য এই বিচারধারা প্রযোজ্য নয়।
  • এই বিচারধারা তখনই প্রযোজ্য হবে যখন ব্যবহারকারী নিষিদ্ধ হওয়ার বা বাধা পাওয়ার পরেও একইরকমভাবে নিবন্ধ তৈরি করবে বা সম্পাদনা করবে। সীমিতভাবে বাধাপ্রাপ্ত ব্যবহারকারী যদি ভিন্ন বিষয়ে (যে বিষয়ের কারণে তিনি নিষিদ্ধ হননি বা বাধা পাননি) নিবন্ধ লেখেন বা সম্পাদনা করেন, তবে এ বিচারধারা প্রযোজ্য হবে না।
  1. প্রযুক্তিগত অপসারণ:

এই বিচারধারাটি বিতর্কহীনভাবে নিম্নোক্ত ক্ষেত্রে প্রযোজ্য হবেঃ

  • খালি বিষয়শ্রেণী অপসারণ
  • একটিমাত্র নিবন্ধই আছে এমন দ্ব্যর্থতা নিরসনকারী পাতা অপসারণ
  • পাতা স্থানান্তরে বাধা সৃষ্টিকারী পুনর্নির্দেশকারী কিংবা অন্য কোনো পাতা অপসারণ। প্রশাসকগণের এ সম্পর্কে পরিষ্কার ধারণা থাকতে হবে। পুনর্নির্দেশনা ছাড়াই স্থানান্তরের ক্ষেত্রে আগের শিরোনমটি অন্য কোথাও ব্যবহার হয়েছে কিনা তা খেয়াল করতে হবে। প্রশাসকের নিশ্চিত করতে হবে যে স্থানান্তরে বাধা সৃষ্টিকারী পাতা অপসারণের পর স্থানান্তর প্রক্রিয়া সম্পন্ন করা হয়েছে।
  • ভুলবশত বা ভুল নামে সৃষ্ট নিবন্ধ অপসারণ
  • টেমপ্লেট আলোচনার মাধ্যমে অনাথকৃত টেমপ্লেট অপসারণ
  • Deleting redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Commons, provided the redirect on Wikipedia has no file links (unless the links are obviously intended for the file or redirect at Commons).
  • Deleting userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text if the user who created the page has been inactive for at least one year.
  • {{Db-g6|rationale=reason}}, {{Db-copypaste|page to be moved}}, {{Db-disambig}}, {{Db-move|page to be moved|reason}}, {{Db-xfd|fullvotepage=link to closed deletion discussion}}, {{db-error}}, {{Db-redircom}}, {{db-blankdraft}}
    • If no special tag like those above can be used, the general {{Db-g6|rationale=reason}} tag should be used instead, with a reason specified in the |rationale= parameter of the tag.
  1. Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith, and provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author. (For redirects created as a result of a pagemove, the mover must also have been the only substantive contributor to the page prior to the move.) If the author blanks the page (outside user space), this can be taken as a deletion request.
  2. Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page, such as talk pages with no corresponding subject page; subpages with no parent page; image pages without a corresponding image; redirects to invalid targets, such as nonexistent targets, redirect loops, and bad titles; or categories populated by deleted or retargeted templates. This excludes any page that is useful to the project, and in particular: deletion discussions that are not logged elsewhere, user and user talk pages, talk page archives, plausible redirects that can be changed to valid targets, and image pages or talk pages for images that exist on Wikimedia Commons.
  3. Office actions. The Wikimedia Foundation office reserves the right to speedily delete a page temporarily in cases of exceptional circumstances. Deletions of this type should not be reversed without permission from the Foundation.
  4. Pages that serve no purpose but to disparage or threaten their subject or some other entity. These are sometimes called "attack pages". This includes legal threats, and biographical material about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral version in the page history to revert to. Both the page title and page content may be taken into account in assessing an attack. Articles about living people deleted under this criterion should not be restored or recreated by any editor until the biographical article standards are met.
  5. প্রকাশ্য বিজ্ঞাপন. Pages that exclusively promote some entity and that would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion.
  6. প্রকাশ্য কপিরাইট বিধিলঙ্ঘন. Text pages that contain copyrighted material with no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a free license, where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving. Only if the history is unsalvageably corrupted should it be deleted in its entirety; earlier versions without infringement should be retained. For equivocal cases (such as where there is a dubious assertion of permission, or where free-content edits overlie the infringement), please consult Wikipedia:Copyright violations.

    Remember to check that the suspected source of the copyright violation is not itself a Wikipedia mirror, and to notify the page's creator when tagging a page for deletion under this criterion; the template {{nothanks-sd}} is available for this. For images and media, see the equivalent criterion in the "Files" section below, which has more specific instructions.

নিবন্ধ[সম্পাদনা]

For any articles that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Wikipedia:Articles for deletion or Wikipedia:Proposed deletion. Note that all these criteria apply to Portals as well.

A1. No context[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article.[১] Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." It applies only to very short articles. Note that context is different from content, treated in A3. Don't use this tag in the first few minutes after a new article is created. This excludes coherent {{Non-English}} material, and poorly translated material. If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate.[২]

A2. Foreign language articles that exist on another Wikimedia project[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to articles having essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia project. If the article is not the same as an article on another project, use the template {{Not English}} instead, and list the page at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English for review and possible translation.

A3. No content[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to articles (other than disambiguation pages, redirects, or soft redirects to Wikimedia sister projects) consisting only of external links, category tags and "See also" sections, a rephrasing of the title, attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, chat-like comments, template tags, and/or images. This may also apply to articles consisting entirely of the framework of the Article wizard with no additional content. However, a very short article may be a valid stub if it has context, in which case it is not eligible for deletion under this criterion. Similarly, this criterion does not cover a page having only an infobox, unless its contents also meet another speedy deletion criterion. This criterion excludes poor writing, coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material. Don't use this tag in the first few minutes after a new article is created.[২]

A5. Transwikied articles[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to any article that consists only of a dictionary definition that has already been transwikied (e.g., to the Wiktionary), a primary source that has already been transwikied (e.g., to Wikisource), or an article on any subject that has been discussed at articles for deletion with an outcome to move it to another wiki, after it has been properly moved and the author information recorded.

A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events)[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to any article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event[৩] that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions.[৪] This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums (these may be covered by CSD A9), software, or other creative works. This criterion does not apply to species of animals, only to individual animal(s). The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion.

If the claim of significance is credible, the A7 tag can not be applied, even if the claim does not meet the notability guidelines. Topics that seemed non-notable to new page patrollers have often been shown to be notable in deletion discussions.

A9. No indication of importance (musical recordings)[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to any article about a musical recording or list of musical recordings where none of the contributing recording artists has an article and that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant (both conditions must be met). This is distinct from questions of verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. This criterion does not apply to other forms of creative media, products, or any other types of articles.

A10. Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to any recently created article with no relevant page history that duplicates an existing English Wikipedia topic, and that does not expand upon, detail or improve information within any existing article(s) on the subject, and where the title is not a plausible redirect. This does not include split pages or any article that expands or reorganizes an existing one or that contains referenced, mergeable material. It also does not include disambiguation pages. (When the new title is a reasonable term for the subject, converting the new article to a redirect may be preferable to deletion.)

  • {{Db-a10|article=Existing article title}}, {{Db-same|article=Existing article title}}

This deletion rationale should only be used rarely. In the vast majority of duplicate articles, the title used is a plausible misspelling or alternate name for the main article, and a redirect should be created instead. This criterion should be used only if its title could be speedy deleted as a redirect.

A11. Obviously invented[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to any article that plainly indicates that the subject was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and does not credibly indicate why its subject is important or significant. The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify under Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Note: This is not intended for hoaxes (see CSD G3).[৫]

For any articles that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Wikipedia:Articles for deletion or Wikipedia:Proposed deletion.

Redirects[সম্পাদনা]

মূল পাতা: Wikipedia:Redirect
For the special criteria for "Neelix" redirects, see criterion X1.

Note: Not all numbers are included as some criteria have been repealed.

R2. Cross-namespace redirects[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to Redirects, apart from shortcuts, from the main namespace to any other namespace except the Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal: namespaces.

If the redirect was the result of a page move, consider waiting a day or two before deleting the redirect. See also Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects and Category:Cross-namespace redirects.

R3. Implausible typos[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to recently created redirects from implausible typos or misnomers. However, redirects from common misspellings or misnomers are generally useful, as are sometimes redirects in other languages. This criterion does not apply to redirects created as a result of a page move,[৬] unless the moved page was also recently created. It also does not apply to articles and stubs that have been converted into redirects, including redirects created by merges,[৭] or to redirects ending with "(disambiguation)" that point to a disambiguation page.

For any redirects, including soft redirects, that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. Redirect pages that have useful page history should never be speedy deleted. In some cases it may be possible to make a useful redirect by changing the target instead of deleting it. Redirects that do not work because of software limitations, such as redirects to special pages or to pages on other wikis, may be converted to soft redirects if they have a non-trivial history or other valid uses.

For reversal of redirects, use {{Db-move}}, a special case of {{Db-g6}}.

Files[সম্পাদনা]

These apply to files, images, and other media.

Note: These criteria formerly began with I (e.g. I1, I6, I9) but have since been replaced with F, without the actual criteria being changed. This was because the file namespace was formerly known as the image namespace.

F1. Redundant[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to unused duplicates or lower-quality/resolution copies of another Wikipedia file having the same file format. This excludes images in the Wikimedia Commons; for these, see criterion F8.[৮]

F2. Corrupt, missing or empty file[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to files that are corrupt, missing, empty, or that contain superfluous and blatant non-metadata information.[৯] This also includes file description pages for Commons files, except pages containing information not relevant to any other project (like {{FeaturedPicture}}).[১০]

F3. Improper license[সম্পাদনা]

This criterion is used to flag media licensed as "for non-commercial use only" (including non-commercial Creative Commons licenses), "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only" or "used with permission". These may be deleted, unless they comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. Files licensed under versions of the GFDL prior to 1.3, without allowing for later versions or other licenses, may be deleted.

F4. Lack of licensing information[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to media files that lack the necessary licensing information to verify copyright status may be deleted after being identified as such for seven days if the information is not added. Administrators should check the upload summary, file information page, and the image itself for a source before deleting under this criterion.

F5. Orphaned non-free use images[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to images and other media that are not under a free license or in the public domain and that are not used in any article. These may be deleted after being identified as such for more than seven days or immediately if the image's only use was on a deleted article and it is very unlikely to have any use on any other valid article. This includes previous revisions of the image. Reasonable exceptions may be made for images uploaded for an upcoming article.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to non-free files claiming fair use but without a use rationale. These may be deleted after being identified as such for seven days. The boilerplate copyright tags setting out fair use criteria do not constitute a rationale. This criterion does not apply to situations where a use rationale is provided but is disputed.

F7. Invalid fair-use claim[সম্পাদনা]

  • Non-free images or media with a clearly invalid fair-use tag (such as a {{Non-free logo}} tag on a photograph of a mascot) may be deleted immediately.
  • Non-free images or media from a commercial source (e.g., Associated Press, Getty), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary, are considered an invalid claim of fair use and fail the strict requirements of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria; and may be deleted immediately.
  • Non-free images or media that have been identified as being replaceable by a free image and tagged with {{subst:Rfu}} may be deleted after two days, if no justification is given for the claim of irreplaceability. If the replaceability is disputed, the nominator should not be the one deleting the image.
  • Invalid fair-use claims tagged with {{subst:Dfu}} may be deleted seven days after they are tagged, if a full and valid fair-use use rationale is not added.
  • {{Db-f7}}, {{Db-badfairuse}} (immediate F7 deletions); {{subst:Rfu}} (replaceable with free image); {{subst:Dfu}} (disputed fair use rationale)

F8. Images available as identical copies on Wikimedia Commons[সম্পাদনা]

Provided the following conditions are met:

  • The Commons version is in the same file format and is of the same or higher quality/resolution.
  • The image's license and source status is beyond reasonable doubt, and the license is undoubtedly accepted at Commons. To avoid deletion at Commons, please ensure the Commons page description has all of the following:
    • Name and date of death of the creator of the artistic work represented by the file, or else clear evidence that a free license was given. If anonymous, ensure the page description provides evidence that establishes the anonymous status.
    • Country where the artistic work represented by the file was situated, or where it was first published.
    • Date when the artistic work represented by the file was created or first published, depending on the copyright law of the origin country.
    • All image revisions that meet the first condition have been transferred to Commons as revisions of the Commons copy and properly marked as such.
  • The image is not marked as {{Do not move to Commons}} or as {{Keep local}}.
  • All information on the image description page is present on the Commons image description page, including the complete upload history with links to the uploader's local user pages (the upload history is not necessary if the file's license does not require it, although it is still recommended).
    • If there is any information not relevant to any other project on the image description page (like {{FeaturedPicture}}), the image description page must be undeleted after the file deletion.
  • If the image is available on Commons under a different name than locally, all local references to the image must be updated to point to the title used at Commons.
  • The image is not protected. Do not delete protected images, even if there is an identical copy on Commons. They are usually locally uploaded and protected here since they are used in the interface or in some widely used high-risk template. Deleting the local copy of an image used in the interface does break things. More about high-risk images.
  • {{C-uploaded}} images may be speedily deleted as soon as they are off the Main Page.

{{Db-f8}}, {{Now Commons}}, {{Now Commons|File:name of file on Commons.ext}}

F9. Unambiguous copyright infringement[সম্পাদনা]

This applies to obviously non-free images (or other media files) that are not claimed by the uploader to be fair use. A URL or other indication of where the image originated should be mentioned. This does not include images with a credible claim that the owner has released them under a Wikipedia-compatible free license. Most images from stock photo libraries such as Getty Images or Corbis will not be released under such a license. Blatant infringements should be tagged with the {{Db-filecopyvio}} template. Non-blatant copyright infringements should be discussed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion.

F10. Useless non-media files[সম্পাদনা]

This criterion is meant for files that are neither image, sound, nor video files; are not used in any article; and have no foreseeable placement in an article. Note that the following files are rarely sound, image, or video: .doc, .pdf, .ps, .html, .rtf, .txt, .xls, and .zip files. Examples of image, sound, and video files are: .jpg, .gif, .png, .svg, .mpg, and .wav. This is not a comprehensive list of files that can be deleted, nor is an extension alone enough reason to delete; this criterion is based on file content.

F11. No evidence of permission[সম্পাদনা]

If an uploader has specified a license and has named a third party as the source/copyright holder without providing evidence that this third party has in fact agreed, the item may be deleted seven days after notification of the uploader. Acceptable evidence of licensing normally consists of either a link to the source website where the license is stated, or a statement by the copyright holder e-mailed or forwarded to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Such a confirmation is also required if the source is an organization that the uploader claims to represent, or a web publication that the uploader claims to be their own. Instances of obvious copyright violations where the uploader would have no reasonable expectation of obtaining permission (e.g. major studio movie posters, television images, album covers, logos that are not simple enough to be public domain, etc.) should be speedily deleted per reason F9 (unambiguous copyright infringement), unless fair-use can be claimed. Files tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days may also be speedily deleted under this criterion. (Please note that the backlog for messages sent to the permissions-en queue is currently টেমপ্লেট:OTRS backlog days. You may wish to wait at least this amount of time before tagging OTRS pending images for deletion.) Images tagged {{OTRS received}} whose permissions have not been confirmed after 30 days may be deleted immediately under this criterion, without waiting an additional seven days, provided a check of the ticket is performed by an OTRS agent to confirm that no further interaction is ongoing.

For any images and other media that are not speedy deletion candidates, use the Wikipedia:Files for discussion process.

Categories[সম্পাদনা]

C1. Unpopulated categories[সম্পাদনা]

This criterion applies to categories that have been unpopulated for at least seven days. This does not apply to disambiguation categories, category redirects, featured topics categories, categories under discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion (or other such discussions), or project categories that by their nature may become empty on occasion (e.g. Category:Wikipedians looking for help). Place {{Empty category}} at the top of the page to prevent such categories from being deleted.

User pages[সম্পাদনা]

Note: Not all numbers are used, as some criteria have been repealed.

U1. User request[সম্পাদনা]

Personal user pages and subpages (but not user talk pages) upon request by their user. This also includes editnotices for user pages. In some rare cases there may be administrative need to retain the page. User talk pages are not eligible for speedy deletion under this criterion. Pages which have previously been moved are generally not eligible, unless all previous titles were in the user's userspace. Note: The template does not display on certain pages (such as .css and .js pages), but its categorization will work.

U2. Nonexistent user[সম্পাদনা]

"WP:U2" এখানে পুননির্দেশ করা হয়েছে। the WikiProject for the band জন্য, দেখুন Wikipedia:WikiProject U2

User pages of users that do not exist (check Special:Listusers), except user pages for IP users who have edited, redirects from misspellings of an established user's user page, and the previous name of a renamed user.

U3. Non-free galleries[সম্পাদনা]

Galleries in the userspace that consist mostly or entirely of "fair use" or non-free images. Wikipedia's non-free content policy prohibits the use of non-free content in userspace, even content that the user has uploaded; use of content in the public domain or under a free license is acceptable.

U5. Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host[সম্পাদনা]

Pages in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals, where the owner has made few or no edits outside of user pages, with the exception of plausible drafts and pages adhering to Wikipedia:User pages#What may I have in my user pages?.

Before placing this template or deleting a page under this criterion, read Wikipedia:User pages#Handling inappropriate content and Wikipedia:User pages#Deletion of user pages.

For any user pages that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.

Templates[সম্পাদনা]

Notes:
Not all numbers are included as some criteria have been repealed.
When nominating, place any of the speedy deletion tags noted here inside <noinclude>...</noinclude> tags.

T2. Misrepresentation of policy[সম্পাদনা]

Templates that are unambiguous misrepresentations of established policy, e.g. disclaimer templates intended to be used in articles and speedy deletion templates for issues other than speedy deletion criteria.

  • <noinclude>{{Db-t2}}</noinclude>, <noinclude>{{Db-policy}}</noinclude>

T3. Duplication and hardcoded instances[সম্পাদনা]

Templates that are substantial duplications of another template, or hardcoded instances of another template where the same functionality could be provided by that other template, may be deleted after being tagged for seven days.

  • <noinclude>{{Db-t3|~~~~~|Other template}}</noinclude>, <noinclude>{{Db-duplicatetemplate|~~~~~|Other template}}</noinclude>

For any templates that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Wikipedia:Templates for discussion.

Portals[সম্পাদনা]

P1. Any portal that would be subject to speedy deletion as an article[সম্পাদনা]

P2. Underpopulated portal[সম্পাদনা]

Any portal based on a topic for which there is only a stub header article or fewer than three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to present under the title of that portal.

For any portals that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.

Non-criteria[সম্পাদনা]

টেমপ্লেট:Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Common requests

The following are not by themselves sufficient to justify speedy deletion.

  1. Reasons based on Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia is not: "a dictionary", "an indiscriminate collection of information", "a crystal ball", "a how-to list", etc.
  2. Less-obvious hoaxes. If even remotely plausible, a suspected hoax article should be subjected to further scrutiny in a wider forum. Truth is often stranger than fiction. Note that "blatant and obvious hoaxes and misinformation" are subject to speedy deletion as vandalism.
  3. Original research. It is not always easy to tell whether an article consists of material that violates the policy against novel theories or interpretations or is simply unsourced.
  4. Neologisms that do not meet A11. New specialized terms should have a wider hearing.
  5. Notability. Articles that seem to have obviously non-notable subjects are eligible for speedy deletion only if the article does not give a credible indication of why the subject might be important or significant.
  6. Failure to assert importance but not an A7, A9 or A11 category. There is no consensus to speedily delete articles of types not specifically listed in A7, A9 or A11 under those criteria.
  7. Author deletion requests made in bad faith. Author deletion requests made in bad faith, out of frustration, or in an attempt to revoke their freely-licensed contributions are not granted. However, anyone may request deletion of pages in their userspace.
  8. Author deletion requests after others have contributed substantially. If other editors have substantially edited an article (i.e. more than just minor corrections or maintenance tagging), the original author may not request deletion under G7 because the work of others is involved.
  9. Very short articles. Short articles with sufficient content and context to qualify as stubs may not be speedily deleted under criteria A1 and A3; other criteria may still apply.
  10. Copies that are not copyright violations. If content appears both here and somewhere else (possibly in modified form), consider the possibility that Wikipedia's is the original version and the other site copied from us. Alternatively, the same author may have written both versions, or the original may be free content.
  11. PNG / GIF files replaced by JPEG images. JPEG encoding discards information that may be important later. Do not delete the original PNG / GIF files.
  12. Questionable material that is not vandalism. Earnest efforts are never vandalism, so to assume good faith, do not delete as vandalism unless reasonably certain.
  13. User and user talk pages of IP addresses. Although users are encouraged to create Wikipedia accounts, unregistered users are still allowed to edit Wikipedia, and are identified by their IP addresses. If an unregistered user has a static IP address, it may have a user page and/or user talk page associated with it, and even for non-static IP addresses, the history can contain important discussions or information that may be of interest.
  14. Reasons based on essays. Wikipedia:Listcruft, Wikipedia:Obscure topics, Wikipedia:Deny recognition etc. are not valid reasons for speedy deletion.
  15. A file that isn't a sound, video, or image file. To be deleted under F10, a file must have no potential usefulness and not be used in any articles. Files that are in use or might be put to an appropriate use, even if not sound, video, or image, should not be deleted without wider discussion.
  16. An article written in a foreign language or script. An article should not be speedily deleted just because it is not written in English. Instead it should be tagged with {{Not English}} and listed at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English. It may be reconsidered after translation whether the article merits deletion, retention or improvement by means of a suitable tag. However, if it already exists on another Wikimedia project, it might be speedy deletable under criterion A2.
  17. Subject request. Sometimes somebody claiming to be the subject of a biographical article requests deletion of the article, or even blanks the article. Article subjects do not have an automatic right to have their articles deleted. Such requests are considered on a case-by-case basis according to the deletion policy.

কোনো নিবন্ধকে দ্রুত অপসারণ করা[সম্পাদনা]

In order to alert administrators that a page meets one of the criteria for speedy deletion, place one of the following relevant templates at the top of the page. Please be sure to supply an edit summary that mentions that the article is being nominated for speedy deletion. All the following templates are named "db-X" with "db" standing for "delete because".

Template Aliases Criteria Used for

The following templates add pages to Category:Candidates for speedy deletion:

{{db}} {{db-reason|reason}}
{{deletebecause|reason}}
{{delbecause|reason}}
{{delete|reason}}
{{d|reason}}
{{Speedy deletion|reason}}
{{Speedy|reason}}
{{csd|reason}}
Replace reason with a specific reason for speedy deletion.
Please try to write out a reason that will be comprehensible to non-Wikipedians.

Or, you can use a specific reason template:

{{db-g1}} {{db-nonsense}} CSD G1 Patent nonsense. You can put {{subst:nonsensepages|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-g2}} {{db-test}} CSD G2 Test page. You can put {{subst:uw-creation1|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-g3}} {{db-vandalism}} CSD G3 Vandalism. You can put {{subst:uw-creation2|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-pagemove}} CSD G3 Nonsense redirects that are created from the cleanup of page move vandalism. You can put {{subst:mp2-n|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-g4}} {{db-repost}} CSD G4 Copies of material that was previously deleted after an XfD discussion. Articles that were only previously speedily deleted do not fall under this category. You can put {{subst:repost-warn|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-g5}} {{db-banned|name of banned user}} CSD G5 Contributions made by a banned user while they were banned.
{{db-g6}} {{db-histmerge|
page to merge history from}}
CSD G6 History merge.
{{db-move|page to be moved|
reason for move}}
CSD G6 Making way for a non-controversial move. Please add the name of the page that is to be moved and the reason for the move.
{{db-copypaste|page to be moved}} CSD G6 Cleaning up copy-and-paste page moves to make way for a clean, non-controversial move. Please add the name of the page that is to be moved.
{{db-xfd}} CSD G6 An admin has closed a deletion debate as a "delete" but not deleted the page.
{{db-maintenance}}
{{db-house}}
CSD G6 Other non-controversial "housekeeping" tasks, such as reversing a redirect.
{{db-g7}} {{db-author}}
{{db-self}}
CSD G7 Speedy request by only editor.
{{db-blanked}} CSD G7 Page blanked by only editor.
{{db-g8}} {{db-talk}} CSD G8 Talk page of a deleted or nonexistent page.
{{db-subpage}} CSD G8 Subpage of a deleted or nonexistent page.
{{db-imagepage}} CSD G8 Image page without a corresponding image.
{{db-redirnone}} CSD G8 Redirect to non-existent page. You can put {{subst:redirnone-warn|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-templatecat}} CSD G8 Category that is populated solely by a template that has been deleted.
{{db-g10}} {{db-attack}} CSD G10 Attack page intended to disparage its subject. You can put {{subst:attack|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-g11}} {{db-spam}} CSD G11 Blatant advertising. You can put {{subst:spam-warn|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-g12|url=URL of source}} {{db-copyvio|url=URL of source}} CSD G12 Blatant copyright violation. You can put {{subst:uw-copyright|page name|url=URL of source}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-a1}} {{db-empty}}
{{db-nocontext}}
CSD A1 Very short articles without context. Use {{subst:empty-warn|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-a2}} {{db-foreign}} CSD A2 Foreign language article duplicated on other Wikimedia project.
{{db-a3}} {{db-nocontent}}
{{db-contact}}
CSD A3 No content other than external links of whatever kind, or an attempt to contact subject of article.
{{db-a5}} {{db-transwiki}} CSD A5 Transwikification completed (if article is a dictionary definition only and has been transwikied, with or without an Articles for deletion discussion).
{{db-a7}} {{db-bio}} CSD A7 Article about a person, group, company, or web content that does not indicate the importance of the subject. Try to use one of the more specific templates rather than {{db-a7}}. You can put {{subst:nn-warn|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page, or, if it seems that someone has created a user page in the encyclopedia section instead of their user page, you can put {{subst:nn-userfy|page name}}-- ~~~~ on their talk page.
{{db-person}} – for people
{{db-band}} – for bands
{{db-club}} – for clubs, societies,
groups, and organizations
{{db-inc}} – for companies and corporations
{{db-web}} – for websites
{{db-a9}} {{db-album}}
{{db-song}}
CSD A9 Article about a musical recording (album, single, etc.) that does not indicate the importance of the subject.
{{db-r2}} {{db-rediruser}} CSD R2 Redirect to a article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, or user talk. You can put {{subst:rediruser-warn|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-r3}} {{db-redirtypo}}
{{db-redirmisnomer}}
CSD R3 Recently created redirect that is a result of an implausible typo or misnomer. You can put {{subst:redirtypo-warn|page name}}~~~~ on the user's talk page.
{{db-f1|replacement file
name.ext
}}
{{db-redundantfile|
replacement file name.ext}}

{{isd|replacement file name.ext}}
CSD F1 Same or better file exists on Wikipedia (see {{db-f8}} for files now on Commons).
{{db-f2}} {{db-nofile}} CSD F2 Corrupt or empty file.
{{db-f3}} {{db-noncom}} CSD F3 "No commercial use" or "by permission" files uploaded after target date.
{{db-f4}} {{db-unksource}} CSD F4 Lack of licensing – Should only be used if the file has been previously tagged with {{no license}}, {{no source}}, or a similar template.
{{db-f5}} {{db-unfree}} CSD F5 Unused copyright file – Should only be used if the file has been previously tagged with {{or-cr}}, {{or-fu}}, or a similar template.
{{db-f6}} {{db-norat}} CSD F6 File with fair use tag but no fair use rationale - must have been tagged as such for seven days and uploaded after May 4, 2006.
{{db-f7}} {{db-badfairuse}} CSD F7 Bad fair use template – file tagged as fair use with a template that is patently irrelevant to the actual file, like {{game-screenshot}} on a photo of a celebrity. Please notify uploader on their talk page using {{subst:badfairuse|File:file name|tag that was on the file}}.
{{db-f8}} {{db-nowcommons}}
{{db-nowcommons|
name of file on Commons.ext}}
CSD F8 Identical file has been moved to or is otherwise available on Commons.
{{db-f9|url=URL of source}} {{db-filecopyvio|url=URL of source}} CSD F9 Blatant copyright infringements.
{{db-f10}} {{db-badfiletype}} CSD F10 Uploaded file that is not an image, video or sound, is unused, and has no foreseeable encyclopedic use.
{{db-f11}} {{db-nopermission}} CSD F11 No evidence of permission from copyright holder to publish under license asserted by uploader – file must have been tagged with {{no permission}}, and uploader notified for seven days.
{{db-c1}} {{db-catempty}} CSD C1 Category that has been empty for at least four days.
{{db-c2}} {{db-speedyrename}} CSD C2 Category being speedily renamed (typo fix, expanding abbreviation, capitalisation fix, compliance with "by country" format, singular to plural conversion or vice versa).
{{db-u1}} {{db-userreq}} CSD U1 User page or subpage requested to be deleted by the user with whom it is associated.
{{db-u2}} {{db-nouser}} CSD U2 Userpages of users who do not exist.
{{db-u3}} {{db-gallery}} CSD U3 Fair use galleries in user space.
{{db-u4}} {{db-oldip}} CSD U4 Old IP talk pages that meet specific criteria.
{{db-t2}} {{db-policy}} CSD T2 Templates that are blatant misrepresentations of established policy.
{{db-t3|~~~~~ |
OtherTemplate}}
{{db-duplicatetemplate|~~~~~ |
OtherTemplate}}
CSD T3 Templates that are duplicates of, hard-coded instances of, or an inferior alternative to another template.
{{db-p2}} {{db-emptyportal}} CSD P2 Underpopulated portal.

প্রশাসকের কার্যপ্রণালী[সম্পাদনা]

অপসারণ করার কারণ পরিষ্কারভাবে অপসারণ লগে উল্লেখ করতে হবে। এবং কিছু ক্ষেত্রে নিবন্ধপ্রণেতাকেও জানাতে হবে।

একটি পাতা অপসারণের পূর্বে পাতার ইতিহাস দেখে নিতে হবে, যে নিবন্ধটিকে পূর্বের অবস্থায় ফিরিয়ে নিলে এর গ্রহণযোগ্যতা থাকে কিনা। এবংঃ

  • প্রাথমিক সম্পাদনার ইতিহাসে হয়ত উৎসের বা নিবন্ধসৃষ্টির কারণ উল্লেখ থাকতে পারে।
  • আলাপ পাতায় নিবন্ধটির পূর্বের অপসারণ আলোচনার বা বর্তমানে চলমান আলোচনার উল্লেখ থাকতে পারে
  • পাতার লগে হয়ত সুরক্ষাবিরোধী তথ্যের কারণে পূর্বে নিবন্ধটিকে অপসারণের ইতিহাস বা নিবন্ধটিকে রাখার ব্যাপারে সঠিক কারণ উল্লেখিত আছে।
  • 'সংযোগকারী পৃষ্ঠাসমূহ' দেখলে হয়ত বোঝা যাবে যে নিবন্ধটির বিষয় বিশ্বকোষে বহুবার উল্লেখিত হয়েছে, কিংবা এখানে সম্পর্কিত পৃষ্ঠা দেখা যেতে পারে যা অপসারণের সম্ভাবনা আছে। যে নিবন্ধগুলো পুনরায় সৃষ্টি করা অনুচিত, সেগুলোকে সংযোগকারী পৃষ্ঠা থেকেও সরিয়ে নিতে হবে।

আরো দেখুন[সম্পাদনা]

তথ্যসূত্র[সম্পাদনা]

  1. টেমপ্লেট:Diff2
  2. Consensus has developed that in most cases articles should not be tagged for deletion under this criterion moments after creation as the creator may be actively working on the content; though there is no set time requirement, a ten-minute delay before tagging under this criterion is suggested as good practice. Please do not mark the page as patrolled prior to that suitable delay passing, so that the wait does not result in the article escaping review at a later time.
  3. Routine coverage of unorganised events – for example, shooting incidents – may not necessarily qualify on A7; deletion discussions should be preferred in such cases.
  4. Past discussions leading to schools being exempt from A7.
  5. Unlike a hoax, subject to deletion as vandalism under CSD G3 as a bad faith attempt to deceive, CSD A11 is for topics that were or may have been actually created and are real, but have no notice or significance except among a small group of people, e.g. a newly invented drinking game or new word.
  6. Page moves are excluded because of a history of improper deletions of these redirects. A move creates a redirect to ensure that any external links that point to Wikipedia remain valid. Should such links exist, deletion of these redirects will break them. Such redirects must be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion before deletion. However, redirects that were obviously made in error can be deleted as G6, technical deletions.
  7. See Wikipedia:Merge and delete for an explanation as to why redirects created by merges cannot be deleted in most cases.
  8. This does not apply to images duplicated on Wikimedia Commons, because of license issues; instead see "Images available as identical copies on the Wikimedia Commons".
  9. Before deleting this latter type of file/page, check whether the MediaWiki engine can read it by previewing a resized thumbnail of it. Even if it renders, if it contains significant superfluous information that cannot be accounted for as metadata directly relating to the media data, it may be deleted. It is always preferred to correct the problem by uploading a file that contains only the good data plus acceptable metadata.
  10. Content from file description pages that is relevant to the Commons should be copied over prior to deleting the local page. If necessary, copy the attribution history as well.