উইকিপিডিয়া:সঠিকতা বিতর্ক

এই পাতাটি বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ার বিষয়বস্তু নির্দেশনার একটি নথি।

এটি একটি গ্রহণযোগ্য আদর্শ, যা সম্পাদকের অনুসরণের চেষ্টা করা উচিত, যদিও তা সাধারণ জ্ঞানে ও ব্যতিক্রমি ক্ষেত্রে সেরা পন্থা অবলম্বন করা হয়। এই পাতার যে-কোনো স্বতন্ত্র সম্পাদনা জনমতের ভিত্তিতে করা উচিত। কোন সন্দেহ থাকলে, প্রথমে তা আলাপ পাতায় আলোচনা করুন।

সংক্ষিপ্তসমূহ

এই উইকিপিডিয়া:যাচাইযোগ্যতা নির্দেশনামূলক পাতাটি একটি ব্যাখ্যামূলক ক্রোড়পত্র।

এই পাতাটিতে "সঠিকতা বিতর্ক" সম্পর্কে ধারণা দেবার মত অতিরিক্ত কিছু তথ্য পেশ করা হয়েছে। এই পাতাটি উইকিপিডিয়ার নীতিমালা ও নির্দেশাবলী সম্পর্কিত নয়। তদ্রুপ, এটি পুঙ্খানুপুঙ্খভাবে সম্প্রদায় দ্বারা নিরীক্ষিতও নয়।

Some articles on Wikipedia may contain significant factual inaccuracies, i.e. information that is যাচাইগতভাবে wrong. Articles for which much of the factual accuracy is actively disputed should have a {{বিতর্কিত}} warning place at the top, and they are listed at বিষয়শ্রেণী:সঠিকতা বিতর্ক. Also see a recent list of disputed articles, and the current list of articles that link here.

টেমপ্লেট:Resources for collaboration

সম্ভব্য ভুল তথ্যযুক্ত বিষয়বস্তু মোকাবেলা

If you see an article that may be inaccurate, please do the following:

Correct it yourself if you can. Add citations to reliable sources to verify the information.
If the neutrality of the content is in question, please see at Wikipedia:NPOV dispute.
If only a few statements seem inaccurate, see Wikipedia:Disputed statement.
If there are several dubious statements, or if a dispute arises:
- Begin a "Disputed" section on the talk page to describe the problem, to alert other editors and gain more opinions on whether the content is inaccurate and how to handle it.
- Paste {{Disputed}} at the beginning of the article to add a general warning.
- If only the accuracy of a section is disputed, add {{Disputed-section}} at the beginning of the section.

তথ্যগত ত্রুটি সতর্কতা পরিচালন

If you see an article with a factual accuracy warning, please do the following:

Don't remove the warning simply because the material appears reasonable: please ensure that content is verifiable using reliable sources, that it is unbiased, and that it contains no original research before removing the notice.
Visit the talk page to see what the issues are.
Correct it yourself if you can. Add citations to reliable sources to verify the information.
If you are sure that a statement is factually inaccurate then remove it, or move it to the talk page for further discussion. If you are familiar with subject matter contained in the article, but are not sure about the accuracy of a statement, then add "{{Citation needed}}" at the end of the statement. If you are not familiar with subject matter contained in the article, but wish to ask about the accuracy of a statement, then raise the issue on the article's talk page. Please see WP:BURDEN and WP:HANDLE for a more detailed explanation of how to handle potentially false or misleading information.

বিতর্ক নিরসন

Check dispute resolution for ways to resolve it.
There are several noticeboards at which accuracy disputes may be listed to gain the views of other editors, particularly the content, reliable sources, no original research, neutral point-of-view, and biographies of living persons noticeboards (see {{Noticeboard links}} for a fuller list).
Once you have found the correct information, edit the page to correct it, remove the warnings, and put something like the following in your edit summary:

Verified article – removed accuracy dispute

বিতর্কিত বিবৃতি

If a Wikipedia article links to this page, it is because someone is concerned that the article contains inaccurate statement(s). Such statements are followed by the following warnings: "[dubious - discuss]".

The accuracy of a statement may be a cause for concern if:

It contains unlikely information, without providing suitable references.
It contains information which is particularly difficult to verify.
It contains information of a highly specific nature and of which changes too frequently to be assumed accurate at any given time.
It has been written (or edited) by a user who is known to write inaccurately on the topic.
It contains information which is ambiguous and open to interpretation, either due to grammar, opinionated wording, so on.

If you come across a statement with an accuracy warning, please do the following:

Don't remove the warning simply because the material looks reasonable: please take the time to verify it properly.
Visit the talk page to see what the issues are.
Correct it right away if you can. Please take the time to verify it properly. Please also add to the article any sources you used to verify the information in it: see cite your sources.

If you come across a statement which seems or is inaccurate, please do the following:

Correct it right away if you can. Please take the time to verify it properly. Please also add to the article citations for any sources you used to verify the information in it: see cite your sources.
If the neutrality of the statement is in question, please look at Wikipedia:NPOV dispute.

If you cannot correct it right away:

First, insert a "Dubious" section in the talk page to describe the problem. (Please don't mark up the article text without first describing the problem on the talk page.)
Insert {{Dubious}} after the relevant sentence or paragraph (add the correct month and year to the template).
(Or insert {{Dubious|talkpage section}} replacing 'talkpage section' with the appropriate section on the talk page, if one already exists.)
If there are more than 5 dubious statements, or if a dispute arises:
- First, insert a "Disputed" section in the talk page to describe the problem. This will help focus contributions from others.
- Insert {{Disputed}} in the beginning of the article to add a general warning. Check dispute resolution for ways to resolve it.
- Once you've found the correct information, edit the page to correct it, remove the warnings, and put something like the following in your edit summary:

Verified article -- removed accuracy dispute

When you add an accuracy warning, you are invited to also help resolve other accuracy disputes or fact-check other articles listed in:

আরো দেখুন