উইকিপিডিয়া:অপসারণ পদ্ধতি

একটি পাতা অপসারণের জন্য মনোনয়নের নির্দেশাবলীর জন্য, দয়াকরে দেখুন অপসারণ নীতি অথবা অপসারণের নির্দেশিকা।

এই অপসারণের প্রক্রিয়া মূলত উইকিপিডিয়ার একটি প্রক্রিয়া যেখানে কোন পাতা ও চিত্র অপসারণ অথবা রেখে দেয়ার ব্যাপারে সম্প্রদায়ের সিদ্ধান্তমূলক বাস্তবায়ন এবং আলোচনা সংরক্ষণ হয়ে থাকে।

Wikipedia has three main methods of deleting pages. A page might qualify for speedy deletion if it meets certain specific criteria, and proposed deletion may be used to suggest that an article is an uncontroversial candidate for deletion. If not, then a deletion discussion must be held in order to form a consensus to delete a page. In general, administrators are responsible for closing these discussions; however, non-administrators in good standing may close them under specific conditions (see the section 'Non-administrators closing discussions').

Note: Office actions and declarations from the Wikimedia Foundation Board or the system administrators, particularly concerning copyright, legal issues, or server load, may take priority over community consensus.

দ্রুত অপসারণ

The speedy deletion process applies to pages which meet at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion, which specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus support to, at their discretion, bypass deletion discussion and immediately delete Wikipedia pages or media.

Before deleting a page through the speedy deletion process, verify that it meets at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion, check the page history to assess whether it would instead be possible to revert and salvage a previous version and to determine whether there was a cut-and-paste move involved, and search for other information which may impact the need or reason for deletion:

• The initial edit summary may have information about the source of or reason for the page.
• The talk page may refer to previous deletion discussions or have ongoing discussion relevant to including the page.
• The page log may have information about previous deletions that could warrant SALTing the page or keeping it.
• WhatLinksHere may show that the page is an oft-referred part of the encyclopedia, or may show other similar pages that warrant deletion. For pages that should not be recreated, incoming links in other pages (except in discussions, archives and tracking pages) should be removed.

If a page is not appropriate for speedy deletion, the page must be edited to remove the speedy deletion tag—this will, in turn, remove the page from Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. Consider notifying the editor who suggested deletion.

When deleting a page through the speedy deletion process, specify the reason for deletion in the deletion summary so that it will be recorded into the deletion log. Quoting page content in the deletion summary may be helpful, but must not be done for attack content or copyrighted text. In some cases, it would be appropriate to notify the page's creator of the deletion.

প্রস্তাবিত অপসারণ

The proposed deletion process applies to articles that do not meet the stringent criteria for speedy deletion, but for which it is believed that deletion would be uncontroversial. In this process, an editor places a tag on the article, and any editor can remove the tag to save the page. If the tag remains after seven days, the page can be deleted. For instructions on handling articles that have been proposed for deletion, see Wikipedia:Proposed deletion#Deletion.

অপসারণ আলোচনা

The deletion discussion processes apply to pages which are formally nominated for deletion through an appropriate deletion discussion venue. Although the steps for closing deletion discussions vary from one deletion discussion venue to another, a few general principles apply at all venues.

কীভাবে একটি অপসারণের আলোচনা শুরু করবেন

এক বা একাধিক নিবন্ধ অপসারণ মনোনয়নের প্রক্রিয়া এখানে নিধারিত রয়েছে।

এছাড়াও এই প্রক্রিয়াটি ব্যাপকভাবে টুইংকেল ব্যবহার করে সহজেই সম্পাদন করা যায়, এটি একটি সফ্টওয়্যার প্যাকেজ যা সকল স্বয়ংনিশ্চিতকৃত ব্যবহারকারী ব্যবহার করতে পারেন।

ঐক্যমত

মূল পাতা: Wikipedia:Consensus

Consensus is formed through the careful consideration, dissection and eventual synthesis of each side's arguments, and should not be calculated solely by the balance of votes.

Outcomes should reflect the rough consensus reached in the deletion discussion and community consensus on a wider scale. (While consensus can change, consensus among a limited group of editors, at one place and time, cannot override community consensus on a wider scale.)

If inappropriate canvassing has taken place, evaluate whether it influenced the outcome of the discussion in a way that compromised the standard consensus-building process.

সংরক্ষণ এবং অপসারণ

আরও দেখুন: Wikipedia:Guide to deletion § Recommendations and outcomes, ও Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes

A deletion discussion may end with one of a number of distinct outcomes, with certain outcomes being more common at certain deletion discussion venues. However, three outcomes are common to all venues: keep, delete and no consensus.

A keep outcome reflects a rough consensus to retain (i.e. not delete) a page, though not necessarily in its current form. To implement a 'keep' outcome: close the deletion discussion as 'keep'; edit the page to remove the deletion notice; and record the outcome on the page's talk page using one of several venue-specific templates (see 'Step-by-step instructions' for details).

A delete outcome reflects a rough consensus to remove (i.e. not retain) a page, including its entire revision history. To implement a 'delete' outcome: close the deletion discussion as 'delete'; delete the page, and link to the deletion discussion in the deletion summary; and, if the page should not be recreated, remove incoming links in other pages (except in discussions, archives and tracking pages).

A no consensus outcome reflects the lack of a rough consensus for any one particular action. To implement a 'no consensus' outcome: close the deletion discussion as 'no consensus'; edit the page to remove the deletion notice; and record the outcome on the page's talk page using one of several venue-specific templates (see 'Step-by-step instructions' for details).

Note: Deletion discussions concerning biographies of living persons who are relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus to keep, may be closed as 'delete' per the deletion policy.

প্রক্রিয়াগত অবসান

In certain situations, a deletion discussion may require a "procedural closure"—a null outcome based on the circumstances of the deletion nomination rather than the merits of the page being discussed. Situations where a procedural closure may be appropriate include:

• The nominated page was not tagged with a corresponding deletion notice. The best course of action is to add the tag and note that you've done so - the time you place the tag would then be treated as the nomination time.
• The nominated page is currently linked from the Main Page. If there are legitimate concerns, please use Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors to have the link removed before nominating the article.
• A subsequent deletion discussion which immediately challenges the outcome of the prior deletion discussion, where a deletion review clearly would be more appropriate. List it at deletion review on the nominator's behalf first, then close the deletion discussion.
• The deletion discussion is listed at the incorrect venue, e.g., a discussion for a file that is hosted on Commons, or for a category listed at Redirects for discussion. This includes discussions that the chosen venue is unable to address.
  • When doing such a close, first list the topic at the correct venue. Then, close the discussion and provide a link to the new discussion. Never close a discussion as a wrong venue without opening a discussion at an appropriate one.

A deletion discussion that is poorly formatted should not be closed for this reason alone, in order to avoid biting new users. Instead, fix it.

প্রারম্ভিক অবসান

In general, deletion discussions should remain open for at least seven days to allow interested editors adequate time to participate. However, under certain circumstances, discussions may be closed prior to the seven-day timeframe.

Closers should apply good judgment before speedily closing a discussion, since often it is best to allow the discussion to continue for the entirety of the seven-day period.

Withdrawn nomination

The nominator may withdraw the nomination at any time. However, if subsequent editors have added substantive comments in good faith, the discussion should not be speedily closed. A nomination should not be withdrawn in order to try to short-circuit an ongoing discussion.

Speedy keep

মূল পাতা: Wikipedia:Speedy keep

A "speedy keep" outcome is appropriate when the nomination unquestionably is an attempt to vandalize or to otherwise create disruption. For example:

• Nominations which are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion (possibly in an attempt to game the system), when dispute resolution would be a more appropriate course.
• Nominations which are made solely to provide a forum for disruption (this includes editor harassment).
• The nominated page is a policy or guideline. The deletion process is not a forum for policy concerns.
• Frivolous or vexatious nominations (recently featured articles, for example). This includes re-nominating the same page with the same arguments immediately after they were strongly rejected in a recently closed deletion discussion.
• Nominations which are so erroneous that they indicate that the nominator has not even read the article in question.
• The nominator is banned, so their edits are not to be retained. In that case, the nominated page is speedily kept while the nomination can be tagged with {{db-g5}} and speedily deleted as a banned contribution. However, if subsequent editors have added substantive comments in good faith, the nomination should not be speedily closed (though the nominator's opinion will be discounted in the closure decision).

Speedy delete

আরও দেখুন: § Speedy deletion

When the nominated page unambiguously falls under at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion, particularly criterion G10 (attack page) or criterion G12 (copyright violation), it is not necessary to wait until the end of the discussion period.

Snowball clause

মূল পাতা: Wikipedia:Snowball clause

When the outcome of the deletion discussion is almost certain, such that there is not a "snowball's chance in hell" that the outcome will be anything other than what is expected.

Note: The "snowball clause" exists to avoid process for the sake of process, and should not be invoked in situations where a particular outcome is merely "likely" or "highly likely", or where there is genuine and reasoned disagreement.

কোরাম নয়

"WP:Soft Deletion" শিরোনামকে এখানে পুনর্নির্দেশ করা হয়েছে। the failed proposal জন্য WP:Soft deletion (failed proposal) দেখুন।

If a nomination has received no comments from any editor besides the nominator (or few in the case of AfDs), the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgment. Common options include, but are not limited to:

• relisting the discussion (see the section 'Relisting discussions');
• closing as "no consensus" with no prejudice against speedy renomination (NPASR); and
• closing in favour of the nominator's stated proposal.
• Soft deletion is a special kind of deletion which may be used after an article's deletion discussion. If a deletion discussion sees very little discussion even after being relisted several times, the administrator can close the discussion as soft delete and delete the page. However, in this case, the article can be restored for any reason on request. If your article was soft-deleted, you can request it be restored at Requests for undeletion.

অন্যান্য ফলাফল

Other possible outcomes include, but are not limited to:

• Disambiguate - Used for articles and redirects. If the discussion concludes that the title can refer to many topics, it can be changed to a disambiguation page to list all of them.
• Incubate - Used at articles for deletion. This changes the article into a draft to be improved so that it meets inclusion requirements.
• Delete but allow undeleting with an appropriate licence - Used for files. If a file is only deleted due to copyright issues, it could be re-uploaded if these issues are resolved
• Listify - Used for categories. This means to delete the category and create a list article instead.
• Merge - Used for articles, categories and templates. This combines two separate pages into a single page. Merge votes should be specific and clear. If you wish to merge templates or categories, use the deletion discussions. If you wish to merge articles, do not use a deletion discussion, but instead discuss it on the talk page.
• Redirect - Used for articles and templates and sometimes other pages. This would be used if the page has no unique and usable content, but information about the topic is found in another article.
• Rename - Used only for categories, where deletion is required to change the name. Other pages may be renamed without deletion by using the move function.
• Retarget - Used for redirects. This means that the redirect should lead to a different page.
• Userfy - Used for articles, templates and miscellaneous pages. This would move the page into the creator's userspace so that they may make improvements. If Wikipedia essays are nominated, they will sometimes be moved to userspace if they are found to violate policies or guidelines.

নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রক্রিয়া

আরও দেখুন: উইকিপিডিয়া:নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা

AFD instructions
close after	7 days (relist if insufficient discussion)
top tag	{{subst:at}} '''RESULT'''. ~~~~
bottom tag	{{subst:ab}}
retire	remove categorization template.
If deleting
delete page incl. reason	[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Article]]
If keeping
tag talk page	{{oldafdfull|date= |result= |page= }}
remove afd tag

এখানে (অর্থাৎ [[উইকিপিডিয়া:নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা/লগ/বছর মাস দিন]]) বর্তমান আবেদন তালিকা মোট এক সপ্তাহ থাকবে ( বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ার ক্ষেত্রে তা অন্যথা হতে পারে) তারপর তা পুরাতন আবেদন তালিকায় নিয়ে যাওয়া হবে। এই টেমপ্লেটটি সমাপ্তি ঘোষণা করা হবে যখন কোন ফাইলকে রেখে দেওয়া হবে বা মুছে ফেলা হবে এই বিষয়ে চূড়ান্ত সিদ্ধান্ত নেওয়া হবে।

প্রক্রিয়া

To process an AFD debate listed on a day page containing debates old enough to be closed:

1. ইহা গুরুত্বপূর্ণ যে সময় নির্ধারণ করতে এবং/অথবা বিতর্ক সমাপ্তি নির্ধারণ করতে প্রথমে {{Closing}} ট্যাগ শিরোনামে যোগ করুন। এর মাধ্যমে অন্যেরা জানতে পারবেন এর সিদ্ধান্ত সমাপ্তি প্রক্রিয়ার মধ্যে আছে।
2. সঠিক ভাবে সিদ্ধান্ত নেবার চেষ্ঠা করুন এবং অপসারন করার আগে একটা ঐক্যমতে পৌছানোর চেষ্ঠা করুন। আরও জানতে দেখুন: প্রশাসকদের অপসারণ নির্দেশাবলী।
3. {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|something}}ট্যাগটি সরিয়ে ফেলুন।
4. {{Closing}} ট্যাগটি সরিয়ে ফেলুন যদি আগে যুক্ত করে থাকেন।.
5. এরপর এই অংশের শীর্ষদেশে যুক্ত করুন: Template:At.
   • শীর্ষদেশে যুক্ত করুন:

     {{subst:at}} '''ফলাফল'''। ~~~~

   • এর আলোচনার শেষে যুক্ত করুন:

     {{subst:ab}}

6. যদি মুছে ফেলা হোক বা অপসারণের-এর পক্ষে সিদ্ধান্ত হয়, তবে ফাইলটিকে মুছে ফেলুন। ( এইটি স্বয়ংক্রিয়ভাবে একটি লগ আকারে থাকবে। মনে করে অবশ্যই "অপসারণের কারণ" হিসাবে আলোচনার পাতার লিঙ্কটি পেস্ট করবেন।( এই ভাবে [[উইকিপিডিয়া:নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা/ফাইল]] ) যুক্ত করুন। যদি সম্ভপব হয় আলাপ পাতা অপসারণ করুন বা যে কোন উপপাতা প্রথমে অপসারণ করুন। আর অবশ্যই দেখে নিন "সংযোগকারী পৃষ্ঠাসমূহ"।
7. যদি রেখে দেওয়া হোক এমন সিদ্ধান্ত হয় :{{oldafdfull}} ট্যাগ নিবন্ধের আলাপ পাতার শীর্ষদেশে যুক্ত করুন এই ভাবে:
             {{oldafdfull|date= প্রস্তাবনার তারিখ |result= '''ফলাফল''' |page= নিবন্ধের নাম }}
   • যদি পুনঃনির্দেশ করা হয়,দুইবার করা পুনর্নির্দেশনাগুলি যেন না হয় সেটা খেয়াল রাখুন।

সমাপ্তির পরে শিরোনাম এবং পাদটীকা লেখা

আলোচনার সমাপ্তির পরে পাতাটি নিচের মত দেখাবে:

নিচের আলোচনাটি নিম্নলিখিত নিবন্ধের অপসারণ প্রস্তাবনার একটি হালনাগাদকৃত বিতর্ক। অনুগ্রহপূর্বক এটি পরিবর্তন করবেন না। নতুন কোনো মন্তব্য বা আলোচনা উপযুক্ত পাতায় করা উচিত (যেমন অপসারিত না হলে নিবন্ধের আলাপ পাতায় বা অপসারিত হলে অপসারণ পর্যালোচনার পাতায়)।

ফলাফল ছিল: ফলাফল. আমার নাম তারিখ

নিবন্ধের নাম

আলোচনার সূত্র

উপরের আলোচনাটি নিবন্ধের অপসারণ প্রস্তাবনার একটি হালনাগাদকৃত বিতর্ক। অনুগ্রহপূর্বক এটি পরিবর্তন করবেন না। নতুন কোনো মন্তব্য বা আলোচনা উপযুক্ত পাতায় করা উচিত (যেমন অপসারিত না হলে নিবন্ধের আলাপ পাতায় বা অপসারিত হলে অপসারণ পর্যালোচনার পাতায়)।

সমাপ্তি আলোচনা

Discussions are usually closed after seven days. If there is a lack of comments, or the action to take is unclear, the discussion may be relisted for an addition seven days. Usually, both closing and relisting are administrator actions.

Non-administrators closing discussions

আরও তথ্যের জন্য দেখুন: Wikipedia:Non-admin closure

In general, administrators are responsible for closing deletion discussions. However, at times the many discussion venues become backlogged. Registered editors who are not administrators may close deletion discussions, with the following provisions:

• Deletion discussions must be decided in accordance with consensus and taking account of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If you are not familiar with deletion policy or the workings of deletion discussions, please avoid closing discussions.
• Non-administrators should not close discussions in which they lack the technical ability to act upon the outcome, such as deletion.
• Close calls and controversial decisions are better left to an administrator.
• In cases where an administrator has deleted a page, including by speedy deletion, but forgot to close the discussion, anyone may close the discussion provided that the administrator's name and deletion summary are included in the closing rationale.
• Closing discussions in which you have offered an opinion or for a page in which you have a vested interest (i.e., a page that you have edited heavily) should be avoided. The sole exception is if you are closing your own withdrawn nomination as a speedy keep and all other viewpoints expressed were for keep as well.
• Non-administrators closing deletion discussions are recommended to disclose their status in the closing decision.

Decisions are subject to review and may be reopened by an administrator. If this happens, take it only as a sign that the decision was not as obvious as you thought. The reopening of the discussion should include an appropriate notice as per WP:TPO.

Participants, including participating administrators, should not reopen non-admin closures. If this happens, any editor other than the closer may restore the closure with an appropriate notice as per WP:TPO. Notice of the restoration should be posted at WP:RFPP.

বিশেষ পরিস্থিতি

ট্রান্সউইকি

If consensus indicates a transwiki should take place, but you do not want to complete the transwiki process immediately:

1. Add a new entry to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old/Transwiki.
2. Add the appropriate tag to the article:
   • {{Copy to Wiktionary}}
   • {{Copy to Wikisource}}
   • {{Copy to Wikiquote}}
   • {{Copy to Wikibooks}}
   • {{Copy to Wikibooks Cookbook}}
   • {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}

বহু পরিবর্তনসহ পাতা

The deletion of pages with long histories may impact server performance. As a precaution, therefore, deletions of pages with more than 5,000 revisions require the special "bigdelete" user right, which administrators do not have. Such deletions can be requested of stewards at meta:Steward requests/Miscellaneous.

আরও দেখুন

2

নামহীন প্যারামিটার 2= আর সমর্থিত নয়। {{কলামের তালিকা}} নথি দেখুন।

• Alternative outlets to recreate deleted articles
• Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
• Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
• Deletion and deletionism
• Deletion archival templates
• Deletion guidelines for administrators
• Deletion policy
• Deletion precedents
• Deletion review guide
• Guide to deletion
• Introduction to deletion process
• List of policies to cite in deletion debates
• Mass nomination
• Page blanking
• Undeletion policy