উইকিপিডিয়া:উইকিপ্রকল্প হিন্দু/মূল্যায়ন

উইকিপিডিয়া, মুক্ত বিশ্বকোষ থেকে
পরিভ্রমণে ঝাঁপ দিন অনুসন্ধানে ঝাঁপ দিন

উইকিপিডিয়া:উইকিপ্রকল্প হিন্দু নিবন্ধগুলির মূল্যায়ন ও ব্যবহার পদ্ধতি

নির্দেশবলী[সম্পাদনা]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Hinduism}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WikiProject Hinduism| ... | class=??? | importance=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Hinduism articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Quality scale[সম্পাদনা]

নিবন্ধের উন্নতি মূল্যায়নের পদ্ধতি
লেবেল বিচারধারা পাঠকের অভিজ্ঞতা সম্পাদকের অভিজ্ঞতা উদাহরণ
Featured article নির্বাচিত
{{FA-Class}}
নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধের বর্তমান বিচারধারা অনুসারে যে নিবন্ধ পর্যালোচনার পরে নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধ হিসাবে সংরক্ষিত হয়েছে।। চুড়ান্ত। সঠিক, আদ্যন্ত নিবন্ধটি বিশ্বকোষীয় তথ্যের জন্য একটি প্রামান্য উৎস। নতুন তথ্য প্রকাশ না হওয়া অবধি আর কোনো সম্পাদনার প্রয়োজন নেই,কিন্তু লেখাতে আরও উন্নতিসাধন এখন সম্ভব । বাংলাদেশ
প্রনি
{{A-Class}}
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of June 2006)
Good article ভাল
{{GA-Class}}
The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. Agriculture (as of June 2006)
GA candidate প্রভাল
{{B-Class}}
Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Munich air disaster (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content & references.
প্রাথমিক
{{Start-Class}}
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element such as a standard infobox. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Arithmetic (as of Oct 2005)
অসম্পূর্ণ
{{অসম্পূর্ণ-শ্রেণী}}{{Stub-Class}}
এই ধরনের নিবন্ধ হয় অতি সংক্ষিপ্ত নতুবা এখানে সংশ্লিষ্ট তথ্যাবলী অসম্পূর্ণ বা এলোপাথারি হয়ে থাকে। প্রনির্বাচিত পর্যায়ের নিবন্ধে উন্নীত করতে এ ধরনের নিবন্ধে যথেষ্ট পরিমাণ সম্পাদনার প্রয়োজন থাকে। সাধারণত এই ধরণের নিবন্ধ খুবই ছোট হয়, কিন্তু অপ্রাসঙ্গিক বা অবোধগম্য তথ্য সংযোজনের ফলে কখনো কখনো যথেষ্ট বড়ও হতে পারে। যাদের কাছে নিবন্ধের বিষয়টিই অজানা, অথবা যারা বিষয়ের নামের বাইরে সেই বিষয়ে তেমন কিছুই অবগত নয়, হয়তো সেই ধরনের পাঠকদের কাছে এইধরনের নিবন্ধ কিছুটা প্রয়োজনীয়। এই ধরনের ভালো নিবন্ধগুলি অনেকটা কোনও বিষয়ের উপর আভিধানিক সংজ্ঞার সাথে তুলনীয়। যেকোনও সম্পাদনা বা অতিরিক্ত তথ্যসংযোজনই এইধরনের নিবন্ধের উন্নতিকল্পে স্বাগত। ঝুঁটিয়াল চটক (ফেব্রুয়ারি ২০২০ তে যেমন ছিল)

Importance scale[সম্পাদনা]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Hinduism.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
সর্বোচ্চ {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
উচ্চ {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
মধ্যম {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
নিম্ন {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

Importance standards[সম্পাদনা]

  • Epics - Generally classed as top importance.
  • Temples - "Mid" if in India , "High" if outside India, "Top" if a well-known temple outside India
  • Biographies - "Top" if outside India
  • Festivals - Probably High or sometimes even Top
  • Deities Top should be kept for about only the ten or twenty most famous. Others that appear in famous texts a number of times are High. The rest including local gods and goddesses are Mid or more likely Low.
  • Gurus/Swamis/Charyas/Rishis The founders of major Hindu sects and philosophies are Top while their followers and students are either Mid or Low depending on their influence.
  • Mantras/Bhanjans The most important mantra (and bhajan/aarti) in a major sect is Top. Other generally famous mantras are High or Mid. The rest, if they even have an article are Low.