বিষয়বস্তুতে চলুন

উইকিপিডিয়া:উইকিপ্রকল্প ভারতের ইতিহাস

উইকিপিডিয়া, মুক্ত বিশ্বকোষ থেকে

লক্ষ্য

[সম্পাদনা]

ভারতের ইতিহাস উইকিপ্রকল্পের লক্ষ্য বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ায় ইতিহাসের ওপর উচ্চমানের নিবন্ধ যোগ করা, যেসব নিবন্ধ পরে সিডি বা কাগজে ছাপা হবে।

সদস্য তালিকা

[সম্পাদনা]

এখানে আপনার নাম যোগ করুন।

প্রতিবর্ণীকরণের জন্য প্রস্তাবিত তালিকাসমূহ

[সম্পাদনা]

সারণি

[সম্পাদনা]

নিচের সারণিতে ভারতের ইতিহাস উইকিপিডিয়ার জন্য আবশ্যকীয় কিছু বেশি বিষয়ক নিবন্ধ তালিকাবদ্ধ করা হল, যাদের মধ্যে সবকটি সর্বোচ্চ গুরুত্বের নিবন্ধ চিহ্নিত করা হয়েছে। লাল সংযোগ বোঝায় নিবন্ধটি এখনও শুরু করা হয়নি।

টেমপ্লেট:HOIOpenTasksUser/Sujit Kumar Das

Syed Mohd Ali/ Popular Medieval Monuments which attracts mostly foreigners Pravesh Tomar/ Tomars history Mohan Reddy Sareddy

SSBATC 07:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC) Include : 1. Forgotten Heroes 2. Commerce & Economy including Merchants, Trade Development, Logistics & Business Practices 3. Science & Technology, including Academics 4. Art & Culture - including Literature, Performing Arts: Folk & Classical

Parentage and Child Projects

[সম্পাদনা]

Parent of this WikiProject:

Child projects

[সম্পাদনা]

WikiProject History of India notice

[সম্পাদনা]

Place this WikiProject notice {{WP India|history=yes}} at the top of an article's Talk page to direct editors to the Wikiproject History of India for guidelines. It will produce:

For Indian history predating 1947, use the "pre=yes" tag, {{WP India|history=yes|pre=yes}}, to produce:

To avoid template clutter, use small versions:

{{WP India|history=yes|small=yes}}, {{WP India|history=yes|pre=yes|small=yes}}

Articles on the post-1947 history of Pakistan fall within the scope of a daughter project, Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Pakistan.

টেমপ্লেট:User WikiProject History of India


টেমপ্লেট:User History of India

ব্যবহারকারী:Shruti14/Userboxes/History-of-India

Conventions and Policies

[সম্পাদনা]

The goal of Wikipedia is to become a complete, accurate encyclopedia. Verifiability is an important tool to achieve accuracy, so it is strongly recommended to check facts. However, don't be too keen to remove unverified information at the cost of completeness.

Primary sources:

"Piece of information or evidence that was created by someone who witnessed first hand or was part of the historical events that are being described".

These are sources which, usually, are recorded by someone who participated in, witnessed, or lived through the event. These are also usually authoritative and fundamental documents concerning the subject under consideration. This includes published original accounts, published original works, or published original research. Physical objects can be primary sources.

Wikipedia would not ordinarily be considered a primary source (see Wikipedia:No original research). Over time, however, this situation may change as researchers may use, for example, analyses of Wikipedia edits and reversions as evidence of shifts and changes in attitudes and approaches.

Secondary sources:

"Piece of writings which were not penned contemporaneously with the events in question".

These are sources which, usually, are accounts, works, or research that analyze, assimilate, evaluate, interpret, and/or synthesize primary sources. These are not as authoritative and are supplemental documents concerning the subject under consideration. This includes published accounts, published works, or published research.

Wikipedia would be considered a secondary source on some occasions.

Tertiary sources:

These are sources which, on average, do not fall into the above two levels. They consist of generalized research of a specific subject under consideration. Tertiary sources are analyzed, assimilated, evaluated, interpreted, and/or synthesized from secondary sources, also. These are not authoritative and are just supplemental documents concerning the subject under consideration.

Wikipedia would be considered a tertiary source on some occasions.

[todo] various types of sources

The letters after an item describes generally the type it is (though this can vary pending the exact source). P is for Primary sources, S is for Secondary sources, and T is for Tertiary sources.

See Wikisource for original text (or primary sources). Wikisource (i.e., "Sourceberg") is a repository of source texts in any language which are either in the public domain, or are released under the GFDL.

See also : Wikipedia:Informative, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Public domain resources, Wikipedia:Don't include copies of primary sources

Style issues for history

[সম্পাদনা]

Main article: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (general style issues)

In historical articles, the past tense is strongly preferred. While history can be written in the present tense, the general audience of Wikipedia will usually expect the past tense on historical subjects and events that occurred in the past. The present tense in English is only correctly used to describe past events in a work of fiction. This is referred to as the "historical past tense".

Remain objective as possible. The point and ideal of Wikipedia is to create an encyclopedic neutral body of knowledge. Avoid using the first-person point of view (emphasising the facts; not the editor). Explain the evidence (from the links and references) and explain the reasons of any conclusions.

See: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Indic), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)

Convention: Use the form most familiar to English speakers. Name pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article unless the native form is more commonly used in English than the anglicized form.

A number of infoboxes can be used for History related articles. These include {{Infobox revolution biography}} and {{Infobox Military Person}}.

See: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)

Names and titles

[সম্পাদনা]

For naming articles See: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles), for use in article content See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)

See: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)

The Gregorian calendar is the calendar currently used in the Western world. If dates used are from the Julian calendar, please make a note as to any differences.

[সম্পাদনা]

See: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Link_titles

The following is a suggested formatted reference link for external links and references.

Appearance:

Source:

* Last name, First name, "''[http://www.url.org Linked article name]''". Source publisher, Location. [[Month Day]], [[Year]].

See also: Wikipedia:Cite your sources, Style guides (for more detailed and formal styles), Wikipedia:External links, Wikipedia:Links

ব্যবহারকারী:WolterBot/Cleanup listing subscription

নিবন্ধের মান যাচাই পদ্ধতি

[সম্পাদনা]
নিবন্ধের উন্নতি মূল্যায়নের পদ্ধতি
লেবেল বিচারধারা পাঠকের অভিজ্ঞতা সম্পাদকের অভিজ্ঞতা উদাহরণ
নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধ নির্বাচিত
{{FA-Class}}
নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধের বর্তমান বিচারধারা অনুসারে যে নিবন্ধ পর্যালোচনার পরে নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধ হিসাবে সংরক্ষিত হয়েছে।। চুড়ান্ত। সঠিক, আদ্যন্ত নিবন্ধটি বিশ্বকোষীয় তথ্যের জন্য একটি প্রামান্য উৎস। নতুন তথ্য প্রকাশ না হওয়া অবধি আর কোনো সম্পাদনার প্রয়োজন নেই,কিন্তু লেখাতে আরও উন্নতিসাধন এখন সম্ভব । বাংলাদেশ
প্রনি
{{A-Class}}
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of June 2006)
Good article ভাল
{{GA-Class}}
The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. Agriculture (as of June 2006)
২য়
{{B-Class}}
Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Munich air disaster (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content & references.
প্রাথমিক
{{Start-Class}}
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element such as a standard infobox. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Arithmetic (as of Oct 2005)
অসম্পূর্ণ
{{অসম্পূর্ণ-শ্রেণী}}{{Stub-Class}}
এই ধরনের নিবন্ধ হয় অতি সংক্ষিপ্ত নতুবা এখানে সংশ্লিষ্ট তথ্যাবলী অসম্পূর্ণ বা এলোপাথারি হয়ে থাকে। প্রনির্বাচিত পর্যায়ের নিবন্ধে উন্নীত করতে এ ধরনের নিবন্ধে যথেষ্ট পরিমাণ সম্পাদনার প্রয়োজন থাকে। সাধারণত এই ধরণের নিবন্ধ খুবই ছোট হয়, কিন্তু অপ্রাসঙ্গিক বা অবোধগম্য তথ্য সংযোজনের ফলে কখনো কখনো যথেষ্ট বড়ও হতে পারে। যাদের কাছে নিবন্ধের বিষয়টিই অজানা, অথবা যারা বিষয়ের নামের বাইরে সেই বিষয়ে তেমন কিছুই অবগত নয়, হয়তো সেই ধরনের পাঠকদের কাছে এইধরনের নিবন্ধ কিছুটা প্রয়োজনীয়। এই ধরনের ভালো নিবন্ধগুলি অনেকটা কোনও বিষয়ের উপর আভিধানিক সংজ্ঞার সাথে তুলনীয়। যেকোনও সম্পাদনা বা অতিরিক্ত তথ্যসংযোজনই এইধরনের নিবন্ধের উন্নতিকল্পে স্বাগত। ঝুঁটিয়াল চটক (ফেব্রুয়ারি ২০২০ তে যেমন ছিল)